Paper detail

Root systems and diagram calculus. I. Regular extensions of Carter diagrams and the uniqueness of conjugacy classes

In 1972, R. Carter introduced admissible diagrams to classify conjugacy classes in a finite Weyl group W. We say that an admissible diagram Γis a Carter diagram if any edge {α, β} with inner product (α, β) > 0 (resp. (α, β) < 0) is drawn as dotted (resp. solid) edge. We construct an explicit transformation of any Carter diagram containing long cycles (with the number of vertices l > 4) into another Carter diagram containing only 4-cycles. Thus, all Carter diagrams containing long cycles can be eliminated from the classification list. There exist diagrams determining two conjugacy classes in W.It is shown that any connected Carter diagram Γcontaining a 4-vertex pattern D_4 or D_4(a_1) determines a single conjugacy class. The main approach is studying different extensions of Carter diagrams. Let \tildeΓ be the Carter diagram obtained from a certain Carter diagram Γby adding a single vertex αconnected to Γat n points, n \leq 3. Let a socket be the set of vertices of Γconnected to α. If the number of sockets available for extensions is equal to 2, then there is a pair of extensions Γ< \tildeΓ_L and Γ< \tildeΓ_R, called mirror extensions and the pair elements w_L and w_R associated with \tildeΓ_L and \tildeΓ_R. We show that w_R = T^{-1}w_L{T} for some T \in W, where the map T is explicitly constructed for all mirror extensions. In Carter's description of the conjugacy classes in a Weyl group a key result (Carter's theorem) states that every element in a Weyl group is a product of two involutions. One of the goals of this paper and its sequels is to prepare the notions and framework in which we give the proof of this fact without appealing to the classification of conjugacy classes.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.