Paper detail

Romanov V48: unusual intermediate polar in the period gap

We studied Romanov V48, which had been considered as a possible polar below the period minimum (orbital period of 0.0420991 d). We analyzed the publicly available Zwicky Transient Facility data and found that this object is an intermediate polar with an orbital period of 0.102312 d (in the period gap) and a spin period of 0.0420991 d. The amplitude of the spin variation was very large (0.6 mag) and the profile has been confirmed to vary with the beat period of 0.071534 d. The ratio between the spin and orbital periods was large and the system resembles the intermediate polar DW Cnc below the period gap. Infrared emission from Romanov V48, however, could not be explained by radiation from the secondary. The infrared excess and the shape of the spectral energy distribution resembled those of polars, suggesting that the emission mechanism in Romanov V48 is similar to those of polars. Romanov V48 may be an intermediate object between intermediate polars and polars.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.