Paper detail

Rolling Horizon Policies in Multistage Stochastic Programming

Multistage Stochastic Programming (MSP) is a class of models for sequential decision-making under uncertainty. MSP problems are known for their computational intractability due to the sequential nature of the decision-making structure and the uncertainty in the problem data due to the so-called curse of dimensionality. A common approach to tackle MSP problems with a large number of stages is a rolling-horizon (RH) procedure, where one solves a sequence of MSP problems with a smaller number of stages. This leads to a delicate issue of how many stages to include in the smaller problems used in the RH procedure. This paper addresses this question for, both, finite and infinite horizon MSP problems. For the infinite horizon case with discounted costs, we derive a bound which can be used to prescribe an epsilon-sufficient number of stages. For the finite horizon case, we propose a heuristic approach from the perspective of approximate dynamic programming to provide a sufficient number of stages for each roll in the RH procedure. Our numerical experiments on a hydrothermal power generation planning problem show the effectiveness of the proposed approaches.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.