Paper detail

Rolling and no-slip bouncing in cylinders

The purpose of this paper is to compare a classical non-holonomic system---a sphere rolling against the inner surface of a vertical cylinder under gravity---and a class of discrete dynamical systems known as no-slip billiards in similar configurations. A well-known notable feature of the non-holonomic system is that the rolling sphere does not fall; its height function is bounded and oscillates harmonically up and down. The central issue of the present work is whether similar bounded behavior can be observed in the no-slip billiard counterpart. Our main results are as follows: for circular cylinders in dimension $3$, the no-slip billiard has the bounded orbits property, and very closely approximates rolling motion, for a class of initial conditions which we call transversal rolling impact. When this condition does not hold, trajectories undergo vertical oscillations superimposed to an overall downward acceleration. Considering cylinders with different cross-section shapes, we show that no-slip billiards between two parallel hyperplanes in Euclidean space of arbitrary dimension are always bounded even under a constant force parallel to the plates; for general cylinders, when the orbit of the transverse system (a concept that depends on a factorization of the motion into transversal and longitudinal components) has period two---a very common occurrence in planar no-slip billiards---the motion in the longitudinal direction, under no forces, is generically not bounded. This is shown using a formula for a longitudinal linear drift that we prove in arbitrary dimensions. While the systems for which we can prove the existence of bounded orbits have relatively simple transverse dynamics, we also briefly explore numerically a no-slip billiard system, namely the stadium cylinder billiard, that can exhibit chaotic transversal dynamics.

preprint2018arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.