Paper detail

Role of the triangle mechanism in the $Λ_b\rightarrow Λ_cπ^-f_0(980)$ reaction

We investigate the $Λ_b\toΛ_cπ^-f_0(980)$ production with a $f_0(980)$ decay into $π^+π^-$ via the $K^{*0}K^-K^+$ and $K^{*-}K^0\bar{K}^0$ triangle loops. These loops produce a peak around 1.42 GeV in the $π^-f_0(980)$ invariant mass distribution, which is the same mechanism as the one considered to explain the $a_1(1420)$ peak. In the $π^+π^-$ distribution obtained by fixing the $π^-f_0(980)$ invariant mass to some values, a clear peak of $f_0(980)$ is seen, and the $π^-f_0(980)$ distribution has a peak around $M_{π^-f_0}=1.42$ GeV, which is caused by the triangle mechanism of the $K^*\bar KK$ loop. The branching ratio of $Λ_b\rightarrowΛ_cπ^-f_0(980)$ with $f_0(980)\rightarrowπ^+π^-$ by the triangle mechanism, obtained by integrating the $π^-f_0(980)$ distribution from 1 to 1.6 GeV, is estimated to be the order $10^{-4}$. Future measurements of the $Λ_b\toΛ_cπ^-f_0(980)$ branching ratio and the $π^-f_0(980)$ invariant mass distribution predicted in this work would give further clues to clarify the nature of the $a_1(1420)$ peak.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.