Paper detail

Role of observable nonlinearities in solar cycle modulation

Context. Two candidate mechanisms have recently been considered for the nonlinear modulation of solar cycle amplitudes. Tilt quenching (TQ) is a negative feedback between cycle amplitude and the mean tilt angle of bipolar active regions relative to the azimuthal direction; latitude quenching (LQ) consists in a positive correlation between cycle amplitude and average emergence latitude of active regions. Aims. Here we explore the relative importance of and the determining factors behind the LQ and TQ effects. Methods. The degree of nonlinearity induced by TQ, LQ and their combination is systematically probed in a grid of surface flux transport (SFT) models. The role of TQ and LQ is also explored in the successful 2x2D dynamo model optimized to reproduce the statistical behaviour of real solar cycles. Results. The relative importance of LQ vs TQ is found to correlate with the ratio u 0 /η in the SFT model grid, where u 0 is the meridional flow amplitude and η is diffusivity. An analytical interpretation of this result is given, further showing that the main underlying parameter is the dynamo effectivity range λ R which in turn is determined by the ratio of equatorial flow divergence to diffusivity. The relative importance of LQ vs TQ is shown to scale as C 1 +C 2 /λ 2 R . The presence of a latitude quenching is demonstrated in the 2x2D dynamo, contributing to the nonlinear modulation by an amount comparable to TQ. For other dynamo and SFT models considered in the literature the contribution of LQ to the modulation covers a broad range from being insignificant to being the dominant form of feedback. On the other hand, the contribution of a TQ effect (with the usually assumed amplitude) is never negligible.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.