Paper detail

Role of Non-Ideal Dissipation with Heating-Cooling Misbalance on the Phase Shifts of Standing Slow Magnetohydrodynamic Waves

We analyse the phase shifts of standing, slow magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) waves in solar coronal loops using a linear MHD model taking into account the role of thermal conductivity, compressive viscosity, radiative losses, and heating-cooling misbalance. We estimate the phase shifts in time and space of density and temperature perturbations with respect to velocity perturbations and also calculate the phase difference between density and temperature perturbations. The overall significance of compressive viscosity is found to be negligible for most of the loops considered in the study. For loops with high background density and/or low background temperature, the role of radiative losses (with heating-cooling misbalance) is found to be more significant. Also the effect of heating-cooling misbalance with a temperature- and density-dependent heating function is found to be more significant in the case of longer loop lengths ($L=500$\, Mm). We derived a general expression for the polytropic index [$γ_{\rm eff}$] and found that under linear MHD the effect of compressive viscosity on polytropic index is negligible. The radiative losses with constant heating lead to a monotonic increase of $γ_{\rm eff}$ with increasing density whereas the consideration of an assumed heating function [$H(ρ,T) \propto ρ^{a}T^{b}$, where $a=-0.5$ and $b=-3$] makes the $γ_{\rm eff}$ peak at a certain loop density. We also explored the role of different heating functions by varying the free parameters $a$ and $b$ for a fixed loop of $ρ_0 = 10^{-11}$\, kg $\text{m}^{-3}$, $T_0 = 6.3$\, MK and loop length $L= 180$\, Mm. We find that the consideration of different heating functions [$H(ρ,T)$] leads to a significant variation in the phase difference between density and temperature perturbations; however, the polytropic index remains close to a value of 1.66.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.