Paper detail

Role of defects and geometry in the strength of polycrystalline graphene

Defects in solid commonly limit mechanical performance of the material. However, recent measurements reported that the extraordinarily high strength of graphene is almost retained with the presence of grain boundaries. We clarify in this work that lattice defects in the grain boundaries and distorted geometry thus induced define the mechanical properties characterized under specific loading conditions. Atomistic simulations and theoretical analysis show that tensile tests measure in-plane strength that is governed by defect-induced stress buildup, while nanoindentation probes local strength under the indenter tip and bears additional geometrical effects from warping. These findings elucidate the failure mechanisms of graphene under realistic loading conditions and assess the feasibility of abovementioned techniques in quantifying the strength of graphene, and suggest that mechanical properties of low-dimensional materials could be tuned by implanting defects and geometrical distortion they leads to.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.