Paper detail

Rocky Planetesimals as the Origin of Metals in DZ Stars

{Abridged}. An analysis of the calcium and hydrogen abundances, Galactic positions and kinematics of 146 DZ stars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey demonstrates that interaction with the interstellar medium cannot account for their externally polluted atmospheres. The calcium-to-hydrogen ratios for the 37 DZA stars are dominated by super-solar values, as are the lower limits for the remaining 109 DZ stars. All together their metal-contaminated convective envelopes contain 10^{20+-2} g of calcium, commensurate with the masses of calcium inferred for large asteroids. It is probable that these stars are contaminated by circumstellar matter; the rocky remains of terrestrial planetary systems. In this picture, two predictions emerge: 1) at least 3.5% of all main sequence A- and F-type stars build terrestrial planets; and 2) the DZA stars are externally polluted by both metals and hydrogen, and hence constrain the frequency and mass of water-rich, extrasolar planetesimals.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.