Paper detail

Rocking the Lighthouse: Circumpulsar Asteroids and Radio Intermittency

We propose that neutral, circumpulsar debris entering the light cylinder can account for many time-dependent pulsar phenomena that are otherwise difficult to explain. Neutral material avoids propeller ejection and injects sufficient charges -- after heating, evaporation, and ionization -- to alter current flows and pair-production and thus trigger, detune, or extinguish coherent emission. Relevant phenomena, with time scales from seconds to months, include nulls, rotating radio transients (RRATs), rapid changes in pulse profile (``mode changes''), variable subpulse drift rates, quasi-periodic bursts from B1931+24, and torque variations. Over the 10 Myr lifetime of a canonical pulsar with trillion-gauss surface magnetic field, less than a millionth of an Earth mass of material is needed to modulate the Goldreich-Julian current by 100%. Circumpulsar material originates from metal-rich, supernova fallback gas that aggregates into asteroids. Debris disks can inject sufficient material on time scales of interest, yet be too tenuous to form large planets detectable in pulse timing data. Asteroid migration results from collisions and the radiation-driven Yarkovsky and Poynting-Robertson effects. For B1931+24, an asteroid in a $\sim 40$~day elliptical orbit pollutes the magnetosphere stochastically through collisions with other debris. Injection is less likely for hot, young and highly magnetized pulsars or millisecond pulsars that pre-ionize any debris material well outside their small magnetospheres. Injection effects will therefore be most prominent in long-period, cooler pulsars, consistent with the distribution of relevant objects in perid and period derivative. A pulsar's spin history and its radiation-beam orientation may influence whether it displays nulling, RRATs and other effects.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.