Paper detail

Robustness of different modifications of Grovers algorithm based on generalized Householder reflections with different phases

In this work we study five Grovers algorithm modifications, where each iteration is constructed by two generalized Householder reflections, against inaccuracies in the phases. By using semi-empirical methods, we investigate various characteristics of the dependence between the probability to find solution and the phase errors. The first of them is the robustness of the probability to errors in the phase. The second one is how quickly the probability falls beyond the stability interval. And finally, the average success rate of the algorithm when the parameters are in the range of the highly robust interval. Two of the modifications require usage of the same Grover operator each iteration and in the other three it differs. Those semi-empirical methods give us the, tool to make prediction of the quantum algorithm modifications overall behavior and compare them for even larger register size

preprint2024arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.