Paper detail

Robust State Estimation against Sparse Integrity Attacks

We consider the problem of robust state estimation in the presence of integrity attacks. There are $m$ sensors monitoring a dynamical process. Subject to the integrity attacks, $p$ out of $m$ measurements can be arbitrarily manipulated. The classical approach such as the MMSE estimation in the literature may not provide a reliable estimate under this so-called $(p,m)$-sparse attack. In this work, we propose a robust estimation framework where distributed local measurements are computed first and fused at the estimator based on a convex optimization problem. We show the sufficient and necessary conditions for robustness of the proposed estimator. The sufficient and necessary conditions are shown to be tight, with a trivial gap. We also present an upper bound on the damage an attacker can cause when the sufficient condition is satisfied. Simulation results are also given to illustrate the effectiveness of the estimator.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.