Paper detail

Robust Parameter Identifiability Analysis via Column Subset Selection

We advocate a numerically reliable and accurate approach for practical parameter identifiability analysis: Applying column subset selection (CSS) to the sensitivity matrix, instead of computing an eigenvalue decomposition of the Fischer information matrix. Identifiability analysis via CSS has three advantages: (i) It quantifies reliability of the subsets of parameters selected as identifiable and unidentifiable. (ii) It establishes criteria for comparing the accuracy of different algorithms. (iii) The implementations are numerically more accurate and reliable than eigenvalue methods applied to the Fischer matrix, yet without an increase in computational cost. The effectiveness of the CSS methods is illustrated with extensive numerical experiments on sensitivity matrices from six physical models, as well as on adversarial synthetic matrices. Among the CSS methods, we recommend an implementation based on the strong rank-revealing QR algorithm because of its rigorous accuracy guarantees for both identifiable and non-identifiable parameters.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.