Paper detail

Robust Identification of Target Genes and Outliers in Triple-negative Breast Cancer Data

Correct classification of breast cancer sub-types is of high importance as it directly affects the therapeutic options. We focus on triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) which has the worst prognosis among breast cancer types. Using cutting edge methods from the field of robust statistics, we analyze Breast Invasive Carcinoma (BRCA) transcriptomic data publicly available from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data portal. Our analysis identifies statistical outliers that may correspond to misdiagnosed patients. Furthermore, it is illustrated that classical statistical methods may fail in the presence of these outliers, prompting the need for robust statistics. Using robust sparse logistic regression we obtain 36 relevant genes, of which ca. 60\% have been previously reported as biologically relevant to TNBC, reinforcing the validity of the method. The remaining 14 genes identified are new potential biomarkers for TNBC. Out of these, JAM3, SFT2D2 and PAPSS1 were previously associated to breast tumors or other types of cancer. The relevance of these genes is confirmed by the new DetectDeviatingCells (DDC) outlier detection technique. A comparison of gene networks on the selected genes showed significant differences between TNBC and non-TNBC data. The individual role of FOXA1 in TNBC and non-TNBC, and the strong FOXA1-AGR2 connection in TNBC stand out. Not only will our results contribute to the breast cancer/TNBC understanding and ultimately its management, they also show that robust regression and outlier detection constitute key strategies to cope with high-dimensional clinical data such as omics data.

preprint2018arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.