Paper detail

Robust dimension free isoperimetry in Gaussian space

We prove the first robust dimension free isoperimetric result for the standard Gaussian measure $γ_n$ and the corresponding boundary measure $γ_n^+$ in $\mathbb {R}^n$. The main result in the theory of Gaussian isoperimetry (proven in the 1970s by Sudakov and Tsirelson, and independently by Borell) states that if $γ_n(A)=1/2$ then the surface area of $A$ is bounded by the surface area of a half-space with the same measure, $γ_n^+(A)\leq(2π)^{-1/2}$. Our results imply in particular that if $A\subset \mathbb {R}^n$ satisfies $γ_n(A)=1/2$ and $γ_n^+(A)\leq(2π)^{-1/2}+δ$ then there exists a half-space $B\subset \mathbb {R}^n$ such that $γ_n(AΔB)\leq C\smash{\log^{-1/2}}(1/δ)$ for an absolute constant $C$. Since the Gaussian isoperimetric result was established, only recently a robust version of the Gaussian isoperimetric result was obtained by Cianchi et al., who showed that $γ_n(AΔB)\le C(n)\sqrtδ$ for some function $C(n)$ with no effective bounds. Compared to the results of Cianchi et al., our results have optimal (i.e., no) dependence on the dimension, but worse dependence on $ δ$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.