Paper detail

Robust Covariance Matrix Estimation for Radar Space-Time Adaptive Processing (STAP)

Estimating the disturbance or clutter covariance is a centrally important problem in radar space time adaptive processing (STAP). The disturbance covariance matrix should be inferred from training sample observations in practice. Large number of homogeneous training samples are generally not available because of difficulty of guaranteeing target free disturbance observation, practical limitations imposed by the spatio-temporal nonstationarity, and system considerations. In this dissertation, we look to address the aforementioned challenges by exploiting physically inspired constraints into ML estimation. While adding constraints is beneficial to achieve satisfactory performance in the practical regime of limited training, it leads to a challenging problem. We focus on breaking this classical trade-off between computational tractability and desirable performance measures, particularly in training starved regimes. In particular, we exploit both the structure of the disturbance covariance and importantly the knowledge of the clutter rank to yield a new rank constrained maximum likelihood (RCML) estimator. In addition, we derive a new covariance estimator for STAP that jointly considers a Toeplitz structure and a rank constraint on the clutter component. Finally, we address the problem of working with inexact physical radar parameters under a practical radar environment. We propose a robust covariance estimation method via an expected likelihood (EL) approach. We analyze covariance estimation algorithms under three different cases of imperfect constraints: 1) only rank constraint, 2) both rank and noise power constraint, and 3) condition number constraint. For each case, we formulate estimation of the constraint as an optimization problem with the EL criterion and formally derive and prove a significant analytical result such as uniqueness of the solution.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.