Paper detail

Robust Chauvenet Rejection: Powerful, but Easy to Use Outlier Detection for Heavily Contaminated Data Sets

In Maples et al. (2018) we introduced Robust Chauvenet Outlier Rejection, or RCR, a novel outlier rejection technique that evolves Chauvenet's Criterion by sequentially applying different measures of central tendency and empirically determining the rejective sigma value. RCR is especially powerful for cleaning heavily-contaminated samples, and unlike other methods such as sigma clipping, it manages to be both accurate and precise when characterizing the underlying uncontaminated distributions of data sets, by using decreasingly robust but increasingly precise statistics in sequence. For this work, we present RCR from a software standpoint, newly implemented as a Python package while maintaining the speed of the C++ original. RCR has been well-tested, calibrated and simulated, and it can be used for both one-dimensional outlier rejection and $n$-dimensional model-fitting, with or without weighted data. RCR is free to use for academic and non-commercial purposes, and the code, documentation and accompanying web calculator can be found and easily used online at https://github.com/nickk124/RCR

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.