Paper detail

RNF: a general framework to evaluate NGS read mappers

Aligning reads to a reference sequence is a fundamental step in numerous bioinformatics pipelines. As a consequence, the sensitivity and precision of the mapping tool, applied with certain parameters to certain data, can critically affect the accuracy of produced results (e.g., in variant calling applications). Therefore, there has been an increasing demand of methods for comparing mappers and for measuring effects of their parameters. Read simulators combined with alignment evaluation tools provide the most straightforward way to evaluate and compare mappers. Simulation of reads is accompanied by information about their positions in the source genome. This information is then used to evaluate alignments produced by the mapper. Finally, reports containing statistics of successful read alignments are created. In default of standards for encoding read origins, every evaluation tool has to be made explicitly compatible with the simulator used to generate reads. In order to solve this obstacle, we have created a generic format RNF (Read Naming Format) for assigning read names with encoded information about original positions. Futhermore, we have developed an associated software package RNF containing two principal components. MIShmash applies one of popular read simulating tools (among DwgSim, Art, Mason, CuReSim etc.) and transforms the generated reads into RNF format. LAVEnder evaluates then a given read mapper using simulated reads in RNF format. A special attention is payed to mapping qualities that serve for parametrization of ROC curves, and to evaluation of the effect of read sample contamination.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.