Paper detail

Risk-Sensitive Model Predictive Control

We present a heuristic policy and performance bound for risk-sensitive convex stochastic control that generalizes linear-exponential-quadratic regulator (LEQR) theory. Our heuristic policy extends standard, risk-neutral model predictive control (MPC); however, instead of ignoring uncertain noise terms, our policy assumes these noise terms turns out either favorably or unfavorably, depending on a risk aversion parameter. In the risk-seeking case, this modified planning problem is convex. In the risk-averse case, it requires minimizing a difference of convex functions, which is done (approximately) using the convex-concave procedure. In both cases, we obtain a lower bound on the optimal cost as a by-product of solving the planning problem. We give a numerical example of controlling a battery to power an uncertain load, and show that our policy reduces the risk of a very bad outcome (as compared with standard certainty equivalent control) with negligible impact on the the average performance.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.