Paper detail

Risk Assessment of COVID Infection by Respiratory Droplets from Cough for Various Ventilation Scenarios Inside an Elevator An OpenFOAM based Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis

Respiratory droplets exhaled during speaking, coughing or sneezing have been responsible for the spread of the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic. The droplet dynamics depend on the surrounding air velocity, temperature and relative humidity. Droplets evaporate to form aerosols which contain the disease spreading virus. In a confined space like an elevator, the risk of transmission becomes higher when there is an infected person inside the elevator with other individuals. In this work, a numerical study is carried out in a 3D domain resembling an elevator using OpenFoam. Different modes of air circulation are considered inside the elevator and the impact of these air circulations on droplet dynamics is investigated. The scenario of the opening of elevator door and the passenger leaving the elevator has also been considered in order to simulate a real life condition. A pedantic analysis of certain risk assessment factors and remedial measures to be adopted has been performed which include the number of aerosols present in the zone of 0.8 to 1.8 m, the radial spread of the suspended droplets around the mouth of the infected person. From these factors, the safe condition can be understood. The time period up to which the elevator will be risk prone has also been investigated in case the person coughs just before leaving the elevator. After conducting these studies, the quiescent environment has been found out to be the most dangerous whereas ventilation with an exhaust fan is the safest.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.