Paper detail

Rigorous limits for hadronic and semi-leptonic CP-violating coupling constants from the electric dipole moment of $^{199}$Hg

Relativistic many-body methods at different levels of approximations are employed to gain insights into the passage of the electron correlations from lower to higher levels in the accurate determination of the electric dipole polarizability ($α_d$) and electric dipole moment (EDM) due to the electron-nucleus tensor-pseudotensor (T-PT) and nuclear Schiff moment (NSM) interactions of the $^{199}$Hg ground state. Moreover, plausible reasons for the differences in the previous calculations are pointed out. Comparison between the calculated and experimental results of $α_d$ indicates that our EDM calculations are about 3\% accurate which in combination with the measured value of $^{199}$Hg EDM yield limits for the T-PT coupling constant $C_T < 2.31 \times 10^{-9}$ and the NSM $S<1.55 \times 10^{-12}|e|fm^3$. From this limit of $S$ and the latest nuclear structure calculation, we get improved limits for the strong CP violating parameter $θ_{QCD} < 2.12 \times 10^{-10}$ and the combined up and down quark chromo-EDMs $(-0.004 \tilde{d}_u + 0.020 \tilde{d}_d) < 1.15 \times 10^{-27} |e| cm$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.