Paper detail

Rigorous formulation of two-parameter double-hybrid density-functionals

A two-parameter extension of the density-scaled double hybrid approach of Sharkas et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 134, 064113 (2011)] is presented. It is based on the explicit treatment of a fraction of multideterminantal exact exchange. The connection with conventional double hybrids is made when neglecting density scaling in the correlation functional as well as second-order corrections to the density. In this context, the fraction ac of second-order Møller-Plesset (MP2) correlation energy is not necessarily equal to the square of the fraction ax of Hartree-Fock exchange. More specifically, it is shown that ac \leq ax2, a condition that conventional semi-empirical double hybrids actually fulfill. In addition, a new procedure for calculating the orbitals, which has a better justification than the one routinely used, is proposed. Referred to as λ1 variant, the corresponding double hybrid approximation has been tested on a small set consisting of H2, N2, Be2, Mg2, and Ar2. Three conventional double hybrids (B2-PLYP, B2GP-PLYP, and PBE0-DH) have been considered. Potential curves obtained with λ1- and regular double hybrids can, in some cases, differ significantly. In particular, for the weakly bound dimers, the λ1 variants bind systematically more than the regular ones, which is an improvement in many but not all cases. Including density scaling in the correlation functionals may of course change the results significantly. Moreover, optimized effective potentials based on a partially-interacting system could also be used to generate proper orbitals. Work is currently in progress in those directions.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.