Paper detail

Rigorous derivation and well-posedness of a quasi-homogeneous ideal MHD system

The goal of this paper is twofold. On the one hand, we introduce a quasi-homogeneous version of the classical ideal MHD system and study its well-posedness in critical Besov spaces $B^s_{p,r}(\mathbb{R}^d)$, $d\geq2$, with $1<p<+\infty$ and under the Lipschitz condition $s>1+d/p$ and $r\in[1,+\infty]$, or $s=1+d/p$ and $r=1$. A key ingredient is the reformulation of the system \textsl{via} the so-called Elsässer variables. On the other hand, we give a rigorous justification of quasi-homogeneous MHD models, both in the ideal and in the dissipative cases: when $d=2$, we will derive them from a non-homogeneous incompressible MHD system with Coriolis force, in the regime of low Rossby number and for small density variations around a constant state. Our method of proof relies on a relative entropy inequality for the primitive system, and yields precise rates of convergence, depending on the size of the initial data, on the order of the Rossby number and on the regularity of the viscosity and resistivity coefficients.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.