Paper detail

Rigidity theorems for constant weighted mean curvature hypersurfaces

In this article, we study hypersurfaces $Σ\subset \mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ with constant weighted mean curvature. Recently, Wei-Peng proved a rigidity theorem for CWMC hypersurfaces that generalizes Le-Sesum classification theorem for self-shrinker. More specifically, they showed that a complete CWMC hypersurface with polynomial volume growth, bounded norm of the second fundamental form and that satisfies $|A|^2H(H-λ)\leq H^2/2$ must either be a hyperplane or a generalized cylinder. We generalize this result by removing the bound condition on the norm of the second fundamental form. Moreover, we prove that under some conditions if the reverse inequality holds then the hypersurface must either be a hyperplane or a generalized cylinder. As an application of one of the results proved in this paper, we will obtain another version of the classification theorem obtained by the authors of this article, that is, we show that under some conditions, a complete CWMC hypersurface with $H\geq 0$ must either be a hyperplane or a generalized cylinder.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.