Paper detail

Rigidity, Tensegrity and Reconstruction of Polytopes under Metric Constraints

We conjecture that a convex polytope is uniquely determined up to isometry by its edge-graph, edge lengths and the collection of distances of its vertices to some arbitrary interior point, across all dimensions and all combinatorial types. We conjecture even stronger that for two polytopes $P\subset\mathbb R^d$ and $Q\subset\mathbb R^e$ with the same edge-graph it is not possible that $Q$ has longer edges than $P$ while also having smaller vertex-point distances. We develop techniques to attack this question and verify it in three relevant special cases: if $P$ and $Q$ are centrally symmetric, if $Q$ is a slight perturbation of $P$, and if $P$ and $Q$ are combinatorially equivalent. In the first two cases the statements stay true if we replace $Q$ by some graph embedding $q\colon V(G_P)\to\mathbb R^e$ of the edge-graph $G_P$ of $P$, which can be interpreted as local resp. universal rigidity of certain tensegrity frameworks. We also establish that a polytope is uniquely determined up to affine equivalence by its edge-graph, edge lengths and the Wachspress coordinates of an arbitrary interior point. We close with a broad overview of related and subsequent questions.

preprint2024arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.