Paper detail

Rigidity and tolerance for perturbed lattices

A perturbed lattice is a point process $Π=\{x+Y_x:x\in \mathbb{Z}^d\}$ where the lattice points in $\mathbb{Z}^d$ are perturbed by i.i.d.\ random variables $\{Y_x\}_{x\in \mathbb{Z}^d}$. A random point process $Π$ is said to be rigid if $|Π\cap B_0(1)|$, the number of points in a ball, can be exactly determined given $Π\setminus B_0(1)$, the points outside the ball. The process $Π$ is called deletion tolerant if removing one point of $Π$ yields a process with distribution indistinguishable from that of $Π$. Suppose that $Y_x\sim N_d(0,σ^2 I)$ are Gaussian vectors with with $d$ independent components of variance $σ^2$. Holroyd and Soo showed that in dimensions $d=1,2$ the resulting Gaussian perturbed lattice $Π$ is rigid and deletion intolerant. We show that in dimension $d\geq 3$ there exists a critical parameter $σ_r(d)$ such that $Π$ is rigid if $σ<σ_r$ and deletion tolerant (hence non-rigid) if $σ>σ_r$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.