Paper detail

RG-improved Prediction for 750 GeV Resonance Production at the LHC

We present a renormalization-group (RG) improved prediction for $750$ GeV heavy state production recently seen as the diphoton excess at the LHC. Due to the universality of QCD feature in the threshold region, our result provides reasonable estimate of the K-factor for most existing leading order predictions, independent of the specific nature of the resonance. We consider specifically the spin-$2$ warped Kaluza-Klein graviton model to highlight our calculation. We performed soft gluon resummation near threshold at next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic (NNLL) accuracy together with resumming enhanced corrections from a towers of $π^2$ due to analytic continuation. We find the resummation effects are significant. When matching our resummed result to next-to-leading order calculation, we find our improved predictions exceed the leading fixed-order results by about $56\%$ ($K=1.56$) for the LHC energies at 13 TeV and 14 TeV, and about $63\%$ ($K=1.63$) for 8 TeV.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.