Paper detail

Reynolds number dependence of length scales governing turbulent flow separation with application to wall-modeled large-eddy simulations

This article proposes a Reynolds number scaling of the required grid points to perform wall-modeled LES of turbulent flows encountering separation off a solid surface. Based on comparisons between the various time scales in a non-equilibrium (due to the action of an external pressure gradient) turbulent boundary layer, a simple definition of the near-wall ``under-equilibrium" and ``out-of-equilibrium" scales is put forward (where ``under-equilibrium" refers to scales governed by a quasi-balance between the viscous and the pressure gradient terms). It is shown that the former length scale varies with Reynolds number as lp Re^(-2/3). The same scaling is obtained from a simplified Green's function solution of the Poisson equation in the vicinity of the separation point. A-priori analysis demonstrates that the resolution required to reasonably predict the wall-shear stress (for example, errors lower than approximately 10-15% in the entire domain) in several nonequilibrium flows is at least O(10) lp irrespective of the Reynolds number and the Clauser parameter. Further, a series of a-posteriori validation studies are performed to determine the accuracy of this scaling including the flow over the Boeing speed bump, Song-Eaton diffuser, Notre-Dame Ramp, and the backward-facing step. The results suggest that for these flows, scaling the computational grids () such that / lp is independent of the Reynolds number results in accurate predictions of flow separation at the same ``nominal" grid resolution across different Reynolds numbers. Finally, it is suggested that in the vicinity of the separation and reattachment points, the grid-point requirements for wall-modeled large eddy simulations may scale as Re^4/3, which is more restrictive than the previously proposed flat-plate boundary layer-based estimates (Re1) of Choi and Moin (Phys. Fluids, 2012) and Yang and Griffin (Phys. Fluids, 2021).

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.