Paper detail

REX: Explaining Relationships between Entity Pairs

Knowledge bases of entities and relations (either constructed manually or automatically) are behind many real world search engines, including those at Yahoo!, Microsoft, and Google. Those knowledge bases can be viewed as graphs with nodes representing entities and edges representing (primary) relationships, and various studies have been conducted on how to leverage them to answer entity seeking queries. Meanwhile, in a complementary direction, analyses over the query logs have enabled researchers to identify entity pairs that are statistically correlated. Such entity relationships are then presented to search users through the "related searches" feature in modern search engines. However, entity relationships thus discovered can often be "puzzling" to the users because why the entities are connected is often indescribable. In this paper, we propose a novel problem called "entity relationship explanation", which seeks to explain why a pair of entities are connected, and solve this challenging problem by integrating the above two complementary approaches, i.e., we leverage the knowledge base to "explain" the connections discovered between entity pairs. More specifically, we present REX, a system that takes a pair of entities in a given knowledge base as input and efficiently identifies a ranked list of relationship explanations. We formally define relationship explanations and analyze their desirable properties. Furthermore, we design and implement algorithms to efficiently enumerate and rank all relationship explanations based on multiple measures of "interestingness." We perform extensive experiments over real web-scale data gathered from DBpedia and a commercial search engine, demonstrating the efficiency and scalability of REX. We also perform user studies to corroborate the effectiveness of explanations generated by REX.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.