Paper detail

Reviving Quintessence with an Exponential Potential

We examine a quintessence model with a modified exponential potential given by $V(ϕ) = V_0(1+e^{-λϕ})$. Unlike quintessence with a standard exponential potential, our model can yield an acceptable accelerated expansion at late times, while producing a distinct "early dark energy" signature at high redshift. We determine the evolution of the equation of state parameter, $w_ϕ$, and the density parameter, $Ω_ϕ$, as a function of the scale factor. The strongest constraints on the model come from cosmic microwave background observations rather than supernova data. The former give the limit $λ> 13$. This model predicts a value of the effective neutrino number during Big Bang nucleosynthesis larger than the standard model value. It also provides a partial solution to the coincidence problem, in that the ratio of the quintessence energy density is always within a few orders of magnitude of the background radiation or matter density from the early universe up to the present, but it does not explain why the accelerated expansion is beginning near the present day, suggesting that these two different ways of characterizing the coincidence problem are not entirely equivalent.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.