Paper detail

Reviving old controversies: is the early Galaxy flat or round? Investigations into the early phases of the Milky Way formation through stellar kinematics and chemical abundances

We analyse a set of very metal-poor stars for which accurate chemical abundances have been obtained as part of the ESO Large Program "First stars" in the light of the Gaia DR2 data. The kinematics and orbital properties of the stars in the sample show they probably belong to the thick disc, partially heated to halo kinematics, and to the accreted Nissen & Schuster-Gaia Sausage-Enceladus satellite. The continuity of these properties with stars at both higher ($\rm [Fe/H]>-2$) and lower metallicities ($\rm [Fe/H]<-4.$) suggests that the Galaxy at $\rm [Fe/H] \lesssim -0.5$ and down to at least $\rm [Fe/H]\sim-6$ is dominated by these two populations. In particular, we show that the disc extends continuously from $\rm [Fe/H] \le -4$ (where stars with disc-like kinematics have been recently discovered) up to $\rm [Fe/H] \ge -2$, the metallicity regime of the Galactic thick disc. There exists indeed an "ultra-metal poor thick disc", which constitutes the extremely metal-poor tail of the canonical Galactic thick disc, and which extends this latter from $\rm [Fe/H] \sim -0.5$ up to the most metal-poor stars discovered in the Galaxy up to date. These results suggest that the disc may be the main, and possibly the only stellar population that has formed in the Galaxy at these metallicities. This requires that the dissipative collapse that led to the formation of the old Galactic disc must have been extremely fast. We also discuss these results in the light of recent simulation efforts made to reproduce the first stages of Milky Way-type galaxies.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.