Paper detail

Revival of $H^-$ interpretation of $R_{D^{(*)}}$ anomaly and closing low mass window

Thanks to the recent careful revisit of the theoretical prediction of the $B_c$ meson lifetime, the conservative upper bound on the branching ratio (BR) of $τν$ mode is found to be $\simeq 63\%$ due to the large charm quark mass uncertainty. Although it is well known that a charged Higgs ($H^-$) interpretation of the $R_{D^{(*)}}$ anomaly is excluded by the previously proposed bounds, BR$(B_c\toτν)\le 30\%$ and $\le10\%$, $H^-$ can still explain the anomaly within $1σ$ if we adopt the 63$\%$ one. The scalar contribution is also favored by the polarization data $F_L^{D^*}$ measured at the Belle. Since the implied NP scale is within the reach of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), collider searches are powerful tools to test the scenario. For instance, the $τν$ resonance search has already put the more stringent bound for $m_{H^-}\ge 400\,$GeV. In this work we revisit the further lighter mass range, $180\,$GeV$\le m_{H^-}\le 400\,$GeV which has not been covered yet. We will see that a combination of the conventional stau search and low mass flavor inclusive and bottom flavored di-jet resonance searches can place a new limit on the interpretation. We summarize the current status of the low mass region and discuss the future sensitivity in the high luminosity (HL)-LHC based on the existent collider constraints.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.