Paper detail

Revisiting Wedge Sampling for Budgeted Maximum Inner Product Search

Top-k maximum inner product search (MIPS) is a central task in many machine learning applications. This paper extends top-k MIPS with a budgeted setting, that asks for the best approximate top-k MIPS given a limit of B computational operations. We investigate recent advanced sampling algorithms, including wedge and diamond sampling to solve it. Though the design of these sampling schemes naturally supports budgeted top-k MIPS, they suffer from the linear cost from scanning all data points to retrieve top-k results and the performance degradation for handling negative inputs. This paper makes two main contributions. First, we show that diamond sampling is essentially a combination between wedge sampling and basic sampling for top-k MIPS. Our theoretical analysis and empirical evaluation show that wedge is competitive (often superior) to diamond on approximating top-k MIPS regarding both efficiency and accuracy. Second, we propose a series of algorithmic engineering techniques to deploy wedge sampling on budgeted top-k MIPS. Our novel deterministic wedge-based algorithm runs significantly faster than the state-of-the-art methods for budgeted and exact top-k MIPS while maintaining the top-5 precision at least 80% on standard recommender system data sets.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.