Paper detail

Revisiting Vacuum decay in Field Theory

We revisit the formalism for tunneling in quantum field theory developed by Coleman and collaborators. In particular using the generalization of WKB methods for tunneling in quantum mechanics we avoid the problems with negative eigenvalues and convexity issues associated with Coleman's approach. While the exponential factor is the same, we find differences in the pre-factor. Then we point out that to actually discuss the time evolution of the state, we need a wave packet formulation which we proceed to discuss. Next we address the problem of justifying the application of semi-classical tunneling calculations to the decay of the standard model vacuum, where the classical potential signifies absolute stability, though the effective potential appears to imply the possibility of meta-stability (with more than one local minimum). This is in contrast to the usual situation in applications of the formalism for tunneling, where the \textit{classical} potential has more than one local minimum.

preprint2024arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.