Paper detail

Revisiting Timed Specification Theory II : Realisability

In this paper we present an assume-guarantee specification theory (aka interface theory from [14]) for modular synthesis and verification of real-time systems with critical timing constraints. It is a further step of our earlier work [10] which achieved an elegant algebraic specification theory for real-time systems endowed with the capability to freeze time. In this paper we relinquish such (unrealisable) capability and target more realistic systems without the ability to stop time. Our theory, in a combined process-algebraic and reactive-synthesis style, provides the operations of parallel composition for system integration, logical conjunction/disjunction for viewpoint fusion and independent development, and quotient for incremental synthesis. We show that a substitutive refinement preorder, which is a coarsening of the pre-congruence in [10], constitutes the weakest pre-congruence preserving freedom of incompatibility errors. The coarsening requires a shift in the focus of our theory to a more game-theoretical treatment, where the coarsening constitutes a reactive synthesis game named normalisation and is efficiently implementable by a novel local bot-backpropagation algorithm. Previously, timed concurrent games have been studied in [1,14,13], where one of the key concern is the removal of time-blocking strategies by applying blame assignment [13]. Our timed games also have the issue of time-blocking strategies, which may arise through the composition of specifications. However, due to our distinctively different formulation of timed games, we have discovered another elegant solution to the problem without blame assignment. Our solution utilises a second reactive synthesis game called realisation, which is dual to normalisation and implementable by the dual local top-backpropagation algorithm.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.