Paper detail

Revisiting the WMAP - NVSS angular cross correlation. A skeptic's view

In the context of the study of the ISW, we revisit the angular cross correlation of WMAP CMB data with the NVSS radio survey. We compute 2-point cross functions between the two surveys in real and in Fourier space, paying particular attention on the dependence of results on the flux of NVSS radio sources, the angular scales where correlations arise and the comparison with theoretical expectations. We reproduce previous results that claim an excess of correlation in the angular correlation function (ACF), and we also find some (low significance) similarity between the CMB and radio galaxy data in the multipole range $\el \in $ [10, 25]. However, the S/N in the ACFs increases with higher flux thresholds for NVSS sources, but drops a $\sim$ 30 - 50% in separations of the order of a pixel size, suggesting some residual point source contribution. When restricting our analyses to multipoles $\el \gt $60, we fail to find any evidence for cross correlation in the range $\el \in [2,10]$, where according to the model predictions and our simulations $\sim$ 50% of the S/N is supposed to arise. Also, the accumulated S/N for $\el \lt $60 is below 1, far from the theoretical expectation of S/N$\sim 5$. Part of this disagreement may be caused by an inaccurate modeling of the NVSS source population: as in previous works, we find a level of large scale ($\el \lt $70) clustering in the NVSS catalog that seems incompatible with a high redshift population. This is unlikely to be caused by contaminants or systematics, since it is independent of flux threshold, and hence present for the brightest ($\gt 30 σ$) NVSS sources. Either our NVSS catalogs are not probing the high redshift, large scale gravitational potential wells, or there is a clear mismatch between the ISW component present in WMAP data and theoretical expectations.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.