Paper detail

Revisiting the Thermal Stability of Radiation-dominated Thin Disks

The standard thin disk model predicts that when the accretion rate is over a small fraction of the Eddington rate, which corresponds to $L \ga 0.06 L_{Edd}$, the inner region of the disk is radiation-pressure-dominated and thermally unstable. However, observations of the high/soft state of black hole X-ray binaries with luminosity well within this regime ($0.01L_{Edd} \la L \la 0.5L_{Edd}$) indicate that the disk has very little variability, i.e., quite stable. Recent radiation magnetohydrodynamic simulations of a vertically stratified shearing box have confirmed the absence of the thermal instability. In this paper, we revisit the thermal stability by linear analysis, taking into account the role of magnetic field in the accretion flow. By assuming that the field responses negatively to a positive temperature perturbation, we find that the threshold of accretion rate above which the disk becomes thermally unstable increases significantly compared with the case of not considering the role of magnetic field. This accounts for the stability of the observed sources with high luminosities. Our model also presents a possible explanation as to why only GRS 1915+105 seems to show thermally unstable behavior. This peculiar source holds the highest accretion rate (or luminosity) among the known high state sources, which is well above the accretion rate threshold of the instability.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.