Paper detail

Revisiting the spread spectrum effect in radio interferometric imaging: a sparse variant of the w-projection algorithm

Next-generation radio interferometric telescopes will exhibit non-coplanar baseline configurations and wide field-of-views, inducing a w-modulation of the sky image, which in turn induces the spread spectrum effect. We revisit the impact of this effect on imaging quality and study a new algorithmic strategy to deal with the associated operator in the image reconstruction process. In previous studies it has been shown that image recovery in the framework of compressed sensing is improved due to the spread spectrum effect, where the w-modulation can act to increase the incoherence between measurement and sparsifying signal representations. For the purpose of computational efficiency, idealised experiments were performed, where only a constant baseline component w in the pointing direction of the telescope was considered. We extend this analysis to the more realistic setting where the w-component varies for each visibility measurement. Firstly, incorporating varying w-components into imaging algorithms is a computational demanding task. We propose a variant of the w-projection algorithm for this purpose, which is based on an adaptive sparsification procedure, and incorporate it in compressed sensing imaging methods. This sparse matrix variant of the w-projection algorithm is generic and adapts to the support of each kernel. Consequently, it is applicable for all types of direction-dependent effects. Secondly, we show that for w-modulation with varying w-components, reconstruction quality is significantly improved compared to the setting where there is no w-modulation (i.e. w=0), reaching levels comparable to the quality of a constant, maximal w-component. This finding confirms that one may seek to optimise future telescope configurations to promote large w-components, thus enhancing the spread spectrum effect and consequently the fidelity of image reconstruction.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.