Paper detail

Revisiting the no-boundary proposal with a scalar field

Recent works have suggested that the no-boundary proposal should be defined as a sum over regular, not necessarily compact, metrics. We show that such a prescription can be implemented in the presence of a scalar field. For concreteness, we consider the model of Garay et al., in which the potential is a sum of exponentials, and which lends itself to an analytical treatment. Compared to the earlier implementation, we find that saddle points with unstable fluctuations can be eliminated by imposition of an appropriate regularity condition. This leads to the appearance of additional saddle points, corresponding to unclosed geometries. We argue that such saddles will occur generically, though we also find in our example that they are subdominant to the closed, Hartle-Hawking, saddle points. When the potential is positive, classical spacetime is only predicted for inflationary histories. When the potential is negative, we recover the AdS gravitational path integral, with a stable scalar field included. One puzzle that we find is that in general the path integral must be restricted to sum only over specific, discrete and late time dependent initial values of the scalar field. Only when the scalar is required to take real values is this puzzle eliminated, a situation that moreover leads to advantageous phenomenological characteristics.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.