Paper detail

Revisiting the Mass-Excitation (MEx) diagram using the MaNGA dataset

The diagram comparing the flux ratio of the [OIII] and H$β$ emission lines with the total stellar mass of galaxies (also known as the mass-excitation diagram, MEx) has been widely used to classify the ionization mechanism in high redshift galaxies between star formation and active galactic nuclear ones. This diagram was mainly derived using single-fiber spectroscopy from the SDSS-DR7 survey. In this study, we revise this diagram using the central and integrated spectral measurement from the entire Integral Field Spectroscopic MaNGA sample. Our results suggest that along with the physical parameters of this diagram, the equivalent width of the H$α$ emission line is also required to constrain the ionization mechanism of a high-redshifted galaxy. Furthermore, the location of a galaxy in the excitation-mass diagram varies depending on the use of central or integrated properties.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.