Paper detail

Revisiting the Local Star-Forming Galaxies Observed in the HETDEX Pilot Survey

I have reanalyzed the data obtained for local ($z<0.15$) star-forming galaxies during the pilot survey for the Hobby-Eberly Telescope Dark Energy Experiment (HETDEX)---called the HETDEX Pilot Survey (HPS)---which uses an integral-field-unit spectrograph and covers $\sim3500-5800$ $\unicode{x212B}$ at $\sim5$ $\unicode{x212B}$ resolution. I have newly determined the gas metallicities, $12 + \text{log(O/H)}$, following the Bayesian analysis scheme of the previous study, but dealing carefully with the uncertainty of strong-line calibration, performing reproducibility tests with mock data, and monitoring the convergence of the Markov-Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling. From the mock-data tests, I found that the nebular emission-line color excess $E(B-V)$ can be overestimated by as much as 2-$σ$ or more, although the metallicity can recover the input value to within 1-$σ$. The new metallicity estimates on the HPS data are from well-converged MCMC samples (effective sample sizes $>$ 2000), and they are higher than the previous estimates by $\sim$2-$σ$. Using the HPS data, I also showed that the MCMC sampling can have the statistical accuracy as poor as the one near the iteration start if done without convergence monitoring. The overestimation of $E(B-V)$ indicates the overestimation of the star-formation rates (SFRs) in the previous study, which can be as much as a factor of five. This finding undermines the previous suggestion of a hitherto-unknown galaxy population based on the locations of galaxies in the mass-SFR plane. I found that the independent determination of $E(B-V)$ using either H$β$-H$γ$ or H$α$-H$β$ line pair is ideal for the analysis of forthcoming HETDEX data, but it requires additional cost.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.