Paper detail

Revisiting the influence of unidentified binaries on velocity dispersion measurements in ultra-faint stellar systems

Velocity dispersion measurements of recently discovered Milky Way satellites with $M_V\gtrsim-7$ imply they posses high mass-to-light ratios. The expected velocity dispersions due to their baryonic mass are $\sim0.2$\,km\,s$^{-1}$, but values $\gtrsim3$\,km\,s$^{-1}$ are measured. We perform Monte Carlo simulations of mock radial velocity measurements of these systems assuming they have mass-to-light ratios similar to globular clusters and posses an unidentified binary star population, to determine if these stars could boost the velocity dispersion to the observed values. We find that this hypothesis is unlikely to produce dispersions much in excess of $\sim 4.5$\,km\,s$^{-1}$, in agreement with previous work. However, for the systems with potentially the smallest velocity dispersions, values consistent with observations are produced in 5-40% of our simulations for binary fractions in excess of $f_{bin}(P\le10$\,yrs$)\sim5%$. This sample includes the dwarf galaxy candidates that lie closest to classical globular clusters in $M_V-r_h$ space. Considered as a population, it is unlikely that all of these dwarf galaxy candidates have mass-to-light ratios typical of globular clusters, but boosting of the observed dispersion by binaries from near-zero values cannot be ruled out at high confidence for several individual dwarf galaxy candidates. Given the importance of obtaining accurate velocity dispersions and dynamical masses for the faintest satellites, it is clearly desirable to exclude directly the possible effect of binaries on these systems. This requires multi-epoch radial velocity measurements with individual uncertainties of $\lesssim$1\,km\,s$^{-1}$ to identify spectroscopic binaries with orbital velocities of order the observed velocity dispersion.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.