Paper detail

Revisiting the Impact of Dust Production from Carbon-Rich Wolf-Rayet Binaries

We present a dust spectral energy distribution (SED) and binary stellar population analysis revisiting the dust production rates (DPRs) in the winds of carbon-rich Wolf-Rayet (WC) binaries and their impact on galactic dust budgets. DustEM SED models of 19 Galactic WC ``dustars" reveal DPRs of $\dot{M}_d\sim10^{-10}-10^{-6}$ M$_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$ and carbon dust condensation fractions, $χ_C$, between $0.002 - 40\%$. A large ($0.1 - 1.0$ $μ$m) dust grain size composition is favored for efficient dustars where $χ_C\gtrsim1\%$. Results for dustars with known orbital periods verify a power-law relation between $χ_C$, orbital period, WC mass-loss rate, and wind velocity consistent with predictions from theoretical models of dust formation in colliding-wind binaries. We incorporated dust production into Binary Population and Spectral Synthesis (BPASS) models to analyze dust production rates from WC dustars, asymptotic giant branch stars (AGBs), red supergiants (RSGs), and core-collapse supernovae (SNe). BPASS models assuming constant star formation (SF) and a co-eval $10^6$ M$_\odot$ stellar population were performed at low, Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC)-like, and solar metallicities (Z = 0.001, 0.008, and 0.020). Both constant SF and co-eval models show that SNe are net dust destroyers at all metallicities. Constant SF models at LMC-like metallicities show that AGB stars slightly outproduce WC binaries and RSGs by factors of $2-3$, whereas at solar metallicites WC binaries are the dominant source of dust for $\sim60$ Myr until the onset of AGBs, which match the dust input of WC binaries. Co-eval population models show that for "bursty" SF, AGB stars dominate dust production at late times ($t\gtrsim 70$ Myr).

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.