Paper detail

Revisiting the homogeneous electron gas in pursuit of the properly normed ab initio Eliashberg theory

We address an issue of how to accurately include the self energy effect of the screened electron-electron Coulomb interaction in the phonon-mediated superconductors from first principles. In the Eliashberg theory for superconductors, self energy is usually decomposed using the $2\times 2$ Pauli matrices in the electron-hole space. We examine how the diagonal ($σ_{0}$ and $σ_{3}$) components resulting in the quasiparticle correction to the normal state, $Z$ and $χ$ terms, behave in the homogeneous electron gas in order to establish a norm of treating those components in real metallic systems. Within the $G_{0}W_{0}$ approximation, we point out that these components are non-analytic near the Fermi surface but their directional derivatives and resulting corrections to the quasiparticle velocity are nevertheless well defined. Combined calculations using the $G_{0}W_{0}$ approximation and Eliashberg equations show us that the effective mass and pairing strength strikingly depend on both $Z$ and $χ$, in a different manner. The calculations without the numerically demanding $χ$ term is thus shown to be incapable of describing the homogeneous electron gas limit. This result poses a challenge to accurate first-principles Eliashberg theory.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.