Paper detail

Revisiting the Dichotomy of Early-type Galaxies

We study the relationship among isophotal shapes, central light profiles and kinematic properties of early-type galaxies (ETGs) based on a compiled sample of 184 ETGs. These sample galaxies are included in the Data Release 8 of Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS DR8) and have central light profiles and kinematic properties available from the literature, which were measured based on Hubble Space Telescope ({\it HST}) and \atlas\ integral-field spectrograph (IFS) observations, respectively. We find that there is only a weak correlation between the isophotal shape ($a_{4}/a$) and the central light profile (within $1\,\rm kpc$) of ETGs. About two-fifths of "core" galaxies have disky isophotes, while one-third of "power-law" galaxies are boxy deviated. Our statistical results also show that there are weak correlations between galaxy luminosity and dynamical mass with $a_{4}/a$, but such correlations are tighter with central light profile. Moreover, no clear link has been found between the isophotal shape and the S\' ersic index. Comparisons show that there are similar correlations between $a_{4}/a$ and ellipticity and between $a_{4}/a$ and specific angular momentum $λ_{R_e/2}$ for "power-law" ETGs, but there are no such correlations for "core" ETGs. Therefore, we speculate that the bimodal classifications for ETGs are not as simple as previously thought, though we also find that the most deviated disky ETGs are "power-law", more elongated and fast rotators.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.