Paper detail

Revisiting the Completeness and the Luminosity Function in High-Redshift Low-Luminosity Quasar Surveys

Recent studies have derived quasar luminosity functions (QLFs) at various redshifts. However, the faint side of the QLF at high redshifts is still too uncertain. An accurate estimate of the survey completeness is essential to derive an accurate QLF for use in studying the luminosity-dependent density evolution of the quasar population. Here we investigate how the luminosity dependence of quasar spectra (the Baldwin effect) and the attenuation model for the inter-galactic medium (IGM) affect the completeness estimates. For this purpose, we revisit the completeness of quasar surveys specifically at $z\sim4-5$, using the COSMOS images observed with Subaru/Suprime-Cam. As the result, we find that the completeness estimates are sensitive to the luminosity dependence of the quasar spectrum and difference in the IGM attenuation models. At $z\sim4$, the number density of quasars when we adopt the latest IGM model and take the luminosity dependence of spectra into account are $(3.49\pm1.62)\times10^{-7}$ Mpc$^{-3}$ mag$^{-1}$ for $-24.09<M_{1450}<-23.09$ and $(5.24\pm2.13)\times10^{-7}$ Mpc$^{-3}$ mag$^{-1}$ for $-23.09<M_{1450}<-22.09$, respectively, which are $\sim$$24$$\%$ lower than that estimated by the conventional method. On the other hand, at $z\sim5$, a $1σ$ confidence upper limit of the number density at $-24.5<M_{1450}<-22.5$ in our new estimates is $\sim$$43$$\%$ higher than that estimated previously. The results suggest that the luminosity dependence of the quasar spectrum and the IGM model are important for deriving accurate number density of high-$z$ quasars. Even taking these effects into account, the inferred luminosity-dependent density evolution of quasars is consistent with the AGN down-sizing evolutionary picture.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.