Paper detail

Revisiting the census of low-luminosity AGN

The aim of this paper is to revisit critically the current census of AGN as derived from optical spectroscopy. We considered the spectra of nearby (z<0.1) galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). The equivalent width (EW) distribution of the [O III]5007 emission line is strongly clustered around ~0.6 A, extending the validity of the results we obtained for red giant ellipticals. The close connection between emission lines and stellar continuum points to stellar processes as the most likely source of the bulk of the ionizing photons in these galaxies although their emission line ratios are similar to those of active nuclei. Genuine AGN might be sought mainly among the minority (~5-10%) of outliers, i.e., galaxies with EW>~2 A. The galaxies located in the AGN region of the spectroscopic diagnostic diagrams outnumber outliers by a factor 5-10 which casts doubts on the accuracy of the current identification of active galaxies, particularly those of LINERs of low line luminosity, <~ 10^39-10^40 erg/s. This conclusion can be tested by using spectra that covers smaller physical regions such as those that are already available in the literature of the ~500 nearest bright galaxies, with a stellar continuum reduced by a factor of 20-100 with respect to SDSS galaxies. If the emission lines were mainly of AGN origin, their contrast against the continuum should be enhanced. Instead, their EW distribution is similar to that of the SDSS sample, with just an increase of the outlier fraction. We conclude that the number low-luminosity AGN is currently largely overestimated with a sample purity as low as ~10%. As a consequence the properties of low-luminosity AGN should be fundamentally revised.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.