Paper detail

Revisiting MOA 2013 BLG-220L: A Solar-type star with a Cold super-Jupiter Companion

We present the analysis of high-resolution images of MOA-2013-BLG-220, taken with the Keck adaptive optics system 6 years after the initial observation, identifying the lens as a solar-type star hosting a super-Jupiter mass planet. The masses of planets and host-stars discovered by microlensing are often not determined from light curve data, while the star-planet mass-ratio and projected separation in units of Einstein ring radius are well measured. High-resolution follow-up observations after the lensing event is complete can resolve the source and lens. This allows direct measurements of flux, and the amplitude and direction of proper motion, giving strong constraints on the system parameters. Due to the high relative proper motion, $μ_{\rm rel,Geo} = 12.62\pm0.11$ mas/yr, the source and lens were resolved in 2019, with a separation of $77.1\pm0.5$ mas. Thus, we constrain the lens flux to $K_{\rm Keck,lens}= 17.92\pm0.02$. By combining constraints from the model and Keck flux, we find the lens mass to be $M_L = 0.88\pm0.05\ M_\odot$ at $D_L = 6.72\pm0.59$ kpc. With a mass-ratio of $q=(3.00\pm0.03)\times10^{-3}$ the planet's mass is determined to be $M_P = 2.74\pm0.17\ M_{J}$ at a separation of $r_\perp = 3.03\pm0.27$ AU. The lens mass is much higher than the prediction made by the Bayesian analysis that assumes all stars have an equal probability to host a planet of the measured mass ratio, and suggests that planets with mass ratios of a few 10$^{-3}$ are more common orbiting massive stars. This demonstrates the importance of high-resolution follow-up observations for testing theories like these.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.