Paper detail

Revisiting maximal average fidelity of teleportation

We obtain the maximal average fidelity corresponding to the standard quantum teleportation protocol for an arbitrary isotropic distribution of input states and an arbitrary resource state. We extend this result to a family of von Neumann measurements, which includes the projections onto the computational and Bell basis, considering a Bell-diagonal resource state. We focus on three specific isotropic distributions of input states: 1) completely mixed input states, 2) states with a certain (fixed) degree of purity, and 3) quasi-pure input states. We show that the standard quantum teleportation protocol can teleport arbitrary mixed states with higher average fidelity than its classical counterpart even when the resource of the protocol is a non-entangled state, specifically, a separable Werner state. Moreover, we find that the maximum average fidelity obtained with classical-quantum states used as a resource in a standard teleportation protocol also exceeds the classical fidelity. To establish the role played by the presence or absence of quantum correlations in the resource state and their relation with the correlations present in the von Neumann measurement performed by Alice, we analyze in detail the case of Bell diagonal resource states employing a family of monoparametric basis for which both the Bell and the computational (non-correlated) basis are included. Only in the case where the basis on which Alice measures is completely uncorrelated (computational basis) the maximum average fidelity does not exceed the classical fidelity for any resource state. In all other cases, the maximum average fidelity exceeds the classical one for a certain range of parameters describing the resource state, evidencing the importance of the correlations present in the measurements.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.