Paper detail

Revisiting Kepler: new symmetries of an old problem

The $Kepler$ $orbits$ form a 3-parameter family of $unparametrized$ plane curves, consisting of all conics sharing a focus at a fixed point. We study the geometry and symmetry properties of this family, as well as natural 2-parameter subfamilies, such as those of fixed energy or angular momentum. Our main result is that Kepler orbits is a `flat' family, that is, the local diffeomorphisms of the plane preserving this family form a 7-dimensional local group, the maximum dimension possible for the symmetry group of a 3-parameter family of plane curves. These symmetries are different from the well-studied `hidden' symmetries of the Kepler problem, acting on energy levels in the 4-dimensional phase space of the Kepler system. Each 2-parameter subfamily of Kepler orbits with fixed non-zero energy (Kepler ellipses or hyperbolas with fixed length of major axis) admits $\mathrm{PSL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ as its (local) symmetry group, corresponding to one of the items of a classification due to A. Tresse (1896) of 2-parameter families of plane curves admitting a 3-dimensional local group of symmetries. The 2-parameter subfamilies with zero energy (Kepler parabolas) or fixed non-zero angular momentum are flat (locally diffeomorphic to the family of straight lines). These results can be proved using techniques developed in the 19th century by S. Lie to determine `infinitesimal point symmetries' of ODEs, but our proofs are much simpler, using a projective geometric model for the Kepler orbits (plane sections of a cone in projective 3-space). In this projective model all symmetry groups act globally. Another advantage of the projective model is a duality between Kepler's plane and Minkowski's 3-space parametrizing the space of Kepler orbits. We use this duality to deduce several results on the Kepler system, old and new.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.